Michigan
Environmental Report

Volume 23 . Number 2
April 2005

PURPOSE
Founded in 1980, MEC is a coalition of 70 environmental, public health, and faith-based organizations with nearly 200,000 individual members.  For over 20 years, MEC has provided a voice at the State Capitol.  In addition to serving as a clearinghouse of environmental information, MEC develops public policy, educates elected officials and the public, and provides training and support to member organizations.

The Michigan Environmental Report is an official publication of the Michigan Environmental Council. Copyright 2005.

SUBSCRIBE


OFFICERS

Chairperson

Chris Graham,
Michigan Natural Areas Council

Vice Chair 
Vicki Levengood,
National Environmental Trust

Vice Chair 
Terry Miller,
Lone Tree Council

Treasurer   
Tom Leonard,
West Michigan Environmental Action Council

Secretary  
Jeremy Emmi,
Mchigan Nature Association


MEC STAFF

President  
Lana Pollack

Policy Director
 
James Clift

Associate Director
 
Patrick Diehl

Land Programs Director 

Brad Garmon

Office Manager
 
Judy Bearup

Member Services Director

Michele Scarborough

Policy Specialist

David Gard

Policy Advisor 

Dave Dempsey

Environmental Campaign Coordinator
 
Wendi Tilden

ECCO Field Director
Stephanie Anderson

Land Programs Specialist 
Ben Stupka

MER Design & Layout 

Rose Homa




Past, present DEQ directors clash over best course for Michigan's environment

Former DEQ director's prescription for
healthy (business) environment

By Russell Harding

A restrained regulatory bureaucracy is critical to expanding jobs in Michigan. Make no mistake: Michigan has a well-deserved reputation for having difficult regulations, particularly when it comes to the bureaucratic maze of its environmental requirements.

The state has improved its permitting processes, but its reforms have not kept pace with those of competing states, particularly concerning wetlands and air permits. Governor Jennifer Granholm and the state Legislature should ameliorate our regulatory climate through the following actions, none of which would harm the environment:
  • Adopt a law that prohibits the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) from promulgating regulations that are more stringent than federal requirements without explicit approval from the governor and the Legislature. This law should require DEQ to review current state regulations, too. Federal requirements are already extremely stringent, since they are based on very conservative theoretical assumptions that are calculated to protect the environment from even the most unlikely threats. Michigan doesn't need to inflate these standards, and it will remain more economically competitive if it doesn't.

  • Pass a law that explicitly states that DEQ operating directives are not binding on regulated parties unless the directives are promulgated as regulations. DEQ directives are not subject to the same sunshine laws and public review as formal regulations, which must follow the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act. Nevertheless, many businesses feel compelled to comply with these unilateral and often-burdensome directives out of fear of DEQ retribution.

  • Establish a statutory requirement that the DEQ act on air permits within six months. Manufacturers need new air permits for their plants whenever they make even modest changes to their processes. A six-month requirement would codify in law a goal that state government already tries to meet, thereby adding predictability to a common business procedure.

  • Repeal the Air Toxics Program and rely on the federal Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards that are used by other states. Michigan's early and aggressive regulation in this area has outlived its usefulness, particularly now that the federal government has promulgated the MACT standards. Michigan should not reinvent the wheel for every new air toxics permit.

  • Return the wetlands program to the federal government. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers operates the program in every state except Michigan and New Jersey. Adopting the federal program would put us on an equal footing with other states and free Michigan from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's scrutiny of its standards.

  • Reject the proposed Water Legacy Act, which would require permits to use groundwater. Of the Great Lakes states, only Minnesota requires groundwater permitting. It's a bad idea there, too, but it's more understandable given the semi-arid climate of Minnesota's western regions. Michigan, in contrast, has a wetter climate and already has ample means to protect its groundwater supply. It simply cannot compete with Ohio and Indiana for industry if groundwater is unnecessarily rationed.

Governor Granholm must play an additional role. No matter what laws are passed, she must ensure the DEQ operates in a fair, timely and consistent manner that aids, rather than obstructs, businesses in meeting environmental requirements. A "bottom up" culture, in which DEQ personnel impose arbitrary rules, is a blueprint for disaster.

Russell Harding is former director of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality and is senior environmental policy analyst for the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, a research and educational institute headquartered in Midland.


 

Copyright 2005 Michigan Environmental Council