|
Michigan
Environmental Report
Volume 21 . Number 6
December 2003
PURPOSE
Founded in 1980,
MEC is a coalition of over 60 environmental, public health, and faith-based
organizations with nearly 200,000 individual members. For over
20 years, MEC has provided a voice at the State Capitol. In addition
to serving as a clearinghouse of environmental information, MEC develops
public policy, educates elected officials and the public, and provides
training and support to member organizations.
The Michigan
Environmental Report is an official publication of the Michigan Environmental
Council. Copyright 2003.
SUBSCRIBE
OFFICERS
Chairperson
Chris Graham,
Michigan Natural Areas Council
Vice
Chair
Vicki Levengood,
National Environmental Trust
Vice Chair
Kathryn Savoie, Ph.D.,
ACCESS
Treasurer
Tanya Cabala,
Lake Michigan Federation
Secretary
Brian Imus,
PIRGIM
MEC STAFF
President
Lana Pollack
Policy Director
James Clift
Associate Director
Patrick Diehl
Land Programs Director
Conan Smith
Special Projects Coodinator
Brad Garmon
Office Manager
Judy Bearup
Member Services Director
Michele Scarborough
Policy Specialist
David Gard
Policy Advisor
Dave Dempsey
Communication & Development Associate
Amber Shinn
Environmental
Campaign Coordinator
Wendi Tilden
Project Assistant
Jacquie Styrna
Land
Programs Assistant
Ben Stupka
MER Design & Layout
Rose Homa
|
|

|
|
|
MEC
Groups Score Big Wins for Environment
New
legislation marks first step in reducing sprawl
By
Ben Stupka, MEC Land Programs Assistant
|
A
key piece of sprawl-reducing legislation was scheduled
for signing by Governor Jennifer Granholm this month.
(Signed December 18, 2003 -Ed.)
MEC and PIRGIM worked with bill sponsor Rep. Chris Kolb
(D-Ann Arbor) to get HB 4284 drafted and introduced.
Also known as the Joint Municipal Planning Act, the
bill provides local governments the power to create
joint planning commissions. Its passage marks the first
of the more than 150 recommendations of the Michigan
Land Use Leadership Council to be made into law and
is a major victory in the long struggle to curb costly
urban sprawl.
Though not a complete solution in itself, joint planning
provides a voluntary tool local governments may use
to look at land use regionally-a first step toward protecting
the overall character, economic base and environmental
health. Joint Planning Commissions are legally binding,
cooperative agreements between local governments by
which they create a single joint planning body to oversee
issues for the region, or a portion of a region in which
they each have an interest, such as a business district
or a greenway corridor.
"Planning regionally puts power back into the hands
of local governments, because business and developers
can no longer pit local governments against one another,"
says Brian Imus of PIRGIM. "The old way has created
costly legal battles, annexations and poor development
choices. Joint planning commissions allow governments
to make fiscally sounds decisions and protect community
character and identity."
Currently, Michigan's 1,800 entities with planning authority
do not have the legal ability to work together. Counties,
townships and cities are required to work under different
and unique planning and zoning procedures. If they want
to coordinate plans, they are required to translate
those intentions into three separate plans, each with
unique language and regulations-an unnecessary administrative
burden.
"Planning across jurisdictional boundaries simply
makes good economic and environmental sense," says
Conan Smith, Land Programs Director at MEC. "It
ensures that our communities make smart investments
in road and sewer infrastructure and valuable land resources,
and that transportation planning and school placement
decisions compliment rather than contradict the plans
made by neighboring governments."
HB 4284 also clarifies the rules about cooperative planning,
formalizes the process of coordination and promotes
regionally-common planning principles. Some of the simple
innovations in the bill include allowing developers
and planners from neighboring jurisdictions to work
together to reduce unhealthy competition and unnecessary
sprawl. It also allows the joint planning commission
to choose from single planning statue to work under,
whether it be county, township or city the commission
can use the statue that best suits the project.
Next
steps
For joint planning to be truly effective, legislation
will also have to provide local governments incentives
to plan regionally. MEC is researching an amendment
to the Revenue Sharing Act that would allow units that
coordinate land use and infrastructure plans to qualify
for revenue sharing as a single unit with a higher revenue
sharing calculation factor than they would receive by
applying as individual units. Regions utilizing joint
planning would thus do better in the revenue sharing
distribution.
|
|
|
|