|
Michigan
Environmental Report
Volume 22 . Number 6
December 2004
PURPOSE
Founded in 1980,
MEC is a coalition of over 60 environmental, public health, and faith-based
organizations with nearly 200,000 individual members. For over
20 years, MEC has provided a voice at the State Capitol. In addition
to serving as a clearinghouse of environmental information, MEC develops
public policy, educates elected officials and the public, and provides
training and support to member organizations.
The Michigan
Environmental Report is an official publication of the Michigan Environmental
Council. Copyright 2004.
SUBSCRIBE
OFFICERS
Chairperson
Chris Graham,
Michigan Natural Areas Council
Vice
Chair
Vicki Levengood,
National Environmental Trust
Vice Chair
Terry Miller,
Lone Tree Council
Treasurer
Tom Leonard,
West Michigan Environmental Action Council
Secretary
Brian Imus,
PIRGIM
MEC STAFF
President
Lana Pollack
Policy Director
James Clift
Associate Director
Patrick Diehl
Land Programs Director
Conan Smith
Special Projects Coodinator
Brad Garmon
Office Manager
Judy Bearup
Member Services Director
Michele Scarborough
Policy Specialist
David Gard
Policy Advisor
Dave Dempsey
Environmental
Campaign Coordinator
Wendi Tilden
ECCO Field Director
Stephanie Anderson
Land
Programs Assistant
Ben Stupka
MER Design & Layout
Rose Homa
|
|

|
|
|
Amending the Land Division Act
the right way essential to controlling
urban sprawl
By Ben
Stupka, MEC Land Programs Assistant
|
Michigan's
Land Division Act regulates the division and platting
of land parcels. Essentially, the Act governs property
owners' rights to divide their land for development
and sale. Instead of selling one big parcel, they can
sell off small parcels at a bigger price and make more
money and drive sprawl further out into Michigan's precious
open spaces.
Legislation now exists to amend the Act in response
to suggestions put forward by the Michigan Land Use
Leadership Council (MLULC), a panel appointed by Governor
Jennifer Granholm in 2003. Unless this legislation is
only the first step in revising the Act, Michigan will
continue to suffer from the same trends of unmanaged
growth that have ravaged our countryside and emptied
our cities for too long.
The Act is broken into two distinct parts, one dealing
with platting and the other dealing with the division
of land exempt from the platting process. An exemption
can occur when a split does not result in one or more
parcels of less than 40 acres or the equivalent. Essentially,
this provides the opportunity for developers to build
the condominiums and estates that drive sprawl. The
platting process calls for pre-development infrastructure
to not only be planned for, but to be constructed before
ground is broken for the buildings. Obviously, the preference
in this situation is to have developments go through
the platting process because it forces them to invest
substantially in the property before they build, making
it harder to develop in green, open spaces that do not
currently have infrastructure.
The MLULC made several suggestions to amend the Act
and make those amendments acceptable for both the development
and Smart Growth communities. The council suggested
that shortening the plat review process and requiring
applicants to submit plat requests to the appropriate
departments simultaneously for review, as opposed to
the current sequential review process, would make the
platting process more accessible for developers and
the renewed speed of the process would encourage their
use of it.
The MLULC also suggested the elimination of the 10-year
redivision process. This process has long been a major
driver of sprawl for two reasons: first, the resulting
parcels can keep being divided and developed while staying
exempt of the platting process. Secondly, the split
encourages square large-lot development instead of more
creative planned unit developments that can preserve
open space and limit the effects of sprawl. This change
would also help along two other MLULC recommendations,
namely encouraging land divisions that focused on compact
development and reducing the number of non-platted land
divisions
One important piece of legislation currently deals with
the MLULC recommendations. SB 1416, sponsored by Sen.
Patricia Birkholz (R-Saugatuck), allows developers to
take advantage of a more expedient plat review process
if they agree to a joint review process that includes
all local and county agencies privy to reviewing the
plat. This makes the platting process more accessible
for developers but does not go any distance in amending
the sprawl-inducing components of the Act.
The Land Division Act cannot be overlooked; it is one
of the main factors driving sprawl. For the Act to be
amended properly, all of the recommendations put forth
by the MLULC need to be taken up in a package that will
influence all sides of the land use community to come
together in the spirit of mutual benefit and compromise.
|
|
|
|