|
Michigan
Environmental Report
Volume 22 . Number 6
December 2004
PURPOSE
Founded in 1980,
MEC is a coalition of over 60 environmental, public health, and faith-based
organizations with nearly 200,000 individual members. For over
20 years, MEC has provided a voice at the State Capitol. In addition
to serving as a clearinghouse of environmental information, MEC develops
public policy, educates elected officials and the public, and provides
training and support to member organizations.
The Michigan
Environmental Report is an official publication of the Michigan Environmental
Council. Copyright 2004.
SUBSCRIBE
OFFICERS
Chairperson
Chris Graham,
Michigan Natural Areas Council
Vice
Chair
Vicki Levengood,
National Environmental Trust
Vice Chair
Terry Miller,
Lone Tree Council
Treasurer
Tom Leonard,
West Michigan Environmental Action Council
Secretary
Brian Imus,
PIRGIM
MEC STAFF
President
Lana Pollack
Policy Director
James Clift
Associate Director
Patrick Diehl
Land Programs Director
Conan Smith
Special Projects Coodinator
Brad Garmon
Office Manager
Judy Bearup
Member Services Director
Michele Scarborough
Policy Specialist
David Gard
Policy Advisor
Dave Dempsey
Environmental
Campaign Coordinator
Wendi Tilden
ECCO Field Director
Stephanie Anderson
Land
Programs Assistant
Ben Stupka
MER Design & Layout
Rose Homa
|
|

|
|
|
State
toughens policy on factory farms
By Anne
Woiwode, Mackinac Chapter, Sierra Club
|
Governor
John Engler's Administration actively weakened regulations
to encourage a rapid growth in factory farms, also known
as concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs). Under
the Granholm Administration there have been some significant
changes in policies toward CAFOs, but farm families
and others exposed to the horrific public health and
environmental impact of these operations are seeing
little change in the horrible pollution these facilities
cause on the ground. And more CAFOs are being proposed
in Michigan all the time, with no expectation that the
state will either assure proper siting and regulation,
or slow down the tide.
In 2002, the state agreed to comply with the Clean Water
Act by issuing a general permit under the Clean Water
Act for CAFOs, after environmental groups and the EPA
forced the Engler Administration's hand. A revised permit
issued in 2004 in keeping with Bush Administration rules
requires all new and expanding large CAFOs to obtain
permit coverage. The Sierra Club has brought a contested
case action against the state, contending that the DEQ's
CAFO permit program falls far short of legal requirements,
shutting the public out and effectively rubberstamping
flawed designs that will inevitably cause severe water
pollution problems.
The Red Arrow Dairy CAFO in Van Buren County, whose
permit is being contested by the Sierra Club, within
three months of beginning operations this summer was
found to be discharging contaminated water onto neighboring
property at a level 47 times the state's maximum discharge
level for E. coli bacteria, even though the permit is
for zero discharge. There is strong evidence the DEQ
staff in many areas with CAFOs have neither the time
nor the training to adequately investigate and enforce
the law, leaving neighbors downstream to try to document
pollution and then convince the state to take action.
In the Hudson area, 16 CAFOs have been cited 116 times
collectively for violations of the Clean Water Act since
February 2000, almost entirely as the result of the
volunteer water monitoring of the local group Environmentally
Concerned Citizens of South Central Michigan (ECCSCM).
Since September 2003, the state has filed lawsuits against
three of those CAFOs for gross pollution problems originally
documented by ECCSCM; however, these CAFOs continue
to operate and have had additional water quality violations.
Air quality concerns from CAFOs are even less well regulated
in Michigan, despite growing evidence of potentially
deadly hydrogen sulfide and other emissions from the
buildings, lagoons and land application activities.
In Lenawee County, severe air pollution from CAFOs has
sent neighbors to the emergency room and has been blamed
for causing both lost lung function and neurological
damage in some residents. But the state has yet to take
enforcement action against any CAFO for air pollution,
in part because of severe delays in referrals from MDA
and in part because documentation has been a challenge.
The Bush Administration is proposing a "safe harbor"
agreement which would allow all CAFOs to sign up supposedly
for "research" into air quality problems,
pay a few thousand dollars in fees, and then be exempt
from air pollution enforcement. The Michigan Farm Bureau
at its meeting in early December endorsed the safe harbor
proposal.
|
| |
| |
|
|
|