|
Michigan
Environmental Report
Volume 21 . Number 3
June 2003
PURPOSE
Founded in 1980,
MEC is a coalition of over 60 environmental, public health, and faith-based
organizations with nearly 200,000 individual members. For over
20 years, MEC has provided a voice at the State Capitol. In addition
to serving as a clearinghouse of environmental information, MEC develops
public policy, educates elected officials and the public, and provides
training and support to member organizations.
The Michigan
Environmental Report is an official publication of the Michigan Environmental
Council. Copyright 2003.
SUBSCRIBE
OFFICERS
Chairperson
Chris Graham,
Michigan Natural Areas Council
Vice
Chair
Vicki Levengood,
National Environmental Trust
Vice Chair
Kathryn Savoie, Ph.D.,
ACCESS
Treasurer
Tanya Cabala,
Lake Michigan Federation
Secretary
Brian Imus,
PIRGIM
OFFICERS
President
Lana Pollack
Policy Director
James Clift
Associate Director
Patrick Diehl
Land Programs Director
Conan Smith
Special Projects Coodinator
Brad Garmon
Office Manager
Judy Bearup
Member Services Director
Michele Scarborough
Policy Specialist
David Gard
Policy Advisor
Dave Dempsey
Director of Communications
and Development
David Holtz
Environmental Campaign Coordinator
Wendi Tilden
Project Assistant
Kristin Brooks
Computer Services Assistant
Ben Holcomb
Land Programs Assistant
Ben Stupka
MER Design & Layout
Rose Homa
|
|

|
|
|
The
Environmental Deficit
Mounting cuts will have long-term impacts
By
James Clift, MEC Policy Director
|
Michigan
is faced with a $1.7 billion dollar deficit next year.
The deficit is a result of a downturn in the economy
and tax rollbacks that have reduced the amount of tax
revenues paid by Michigan businesses and individuals.
The deficit will dramatically impact Michigan natural
resources as cuts curtail or eliminate programs designed
to protect our air, water and public health.
General
fund support for the Michigan Department of Environmental
Quality (MDEQ) has fallen 50% over the last two years.
The short-term impacts of these cuts have been delayed
by the use of one-time revenue sources. However, they
will soon be exhausted. DEQ's ability to protect public
health and the environment has already been eroded and
will decline further unless new funding is found.
MDEQ
Budget General Fund
Fiscal Year 2001-02 $101,007,900
FY 01-02 after cuts $ 83,613,700
Fiscal Year 2002-03 $ 72,432,500
FY 02-03 after cuts $ 66,653,161
FY 2003-04 proposed $ 53,055,800
Governor
Granholm tried to protect the MDEQ from further cuts
by replacing general fund with user fee proposals. The
user fees include doing away with free permits to pollute
rivers and lakes, groundwater pollution discharge fees
and landfill inspection fees.
The
new fees will be used to offset the $13.5 million reduction
in general fund support for the department-with the
offset general funds helping to balance the state's
budget. The remaining funds will be used to restore
a small portion of the MDEQ cuts made over the last
three years.
MEC
believes the reasonable user fee proposals need to be
strongly supported. MEC has been working with Clean
Water Action, PIRGIM, WMEAC and the League of Conservation
Voters Education Fund to promote NPDES permit fees in
particular.
Rep.
John Pastor (R-Livonia), Chair of the House Appropriation
Subcommittee for the DEQ, authored a bill that removed
all the new fees and cut general fund support. This
resulted in additional general fund cuts of 15% for
environmental protection programs and 30% for administration-reducing
overall general fund support for the department from
$53 million to $44 million.
Impacts
of the budget cuts
Cuts
to the DEQ Budget approved by the State House would
have the following impacts:
- The
layoff of up to 120 employees.
- Losses
of over $15 million in federal grant money, including
money for drinking water system and sewer upgrades,
non-point source water pollution and radon detection.
Under the clean water program, Michigan loses $4 in
federal money for each $1 the state fails to place
in the fund.
- Long
permit backlogs for businesses-making it harder for
Michigan to attract investment.
- A
risk that some state programs, such as the NPDES (water
pollution discharge) program, could be taken over
by EPA due to the state's failure to operate a credible
program.
- Cuts
to the hazardous waste and solid waste program that
will reduce the inspection of waste generated within
the state or imported from outside our borders.
- Reduced
public access to information on the Internet.
- Continuation
of the policy of free permits for discharges of water
pollution into our Great Lakes.
|
|
|
|