Michigan
Environmental Report

Volume 21 . Number 3
June 2003

PURPOSE
Founded in 1980, MEC is a coalition of over 60 environmental, public health, and faith-based organizations with nearly 200,000 individual members.  For over 20 years, MEC has provided a voice at the State Capitol.  In addition to serving as a clearinghouse of environmental information, MEC develops public policy, educates elected officials and the public, and provides training and support to member organizations.

The Michigan Environmental Report is an official publication of the Michigan Environmental Council. Copyright 2003.

SUBSCRIBE


OFFICERS

Chairperson

Chris Graham,
Michigan Natural Areas Council

Vice Chair 
Vicki Levengood,
National Environmental Trust

Vice Chair 
Kathryn Savoie, Ph.D.,
ACCESS


Treasurer   
Tanya Cabala,
Lake Michigan Federation

Secretary  
Brian Imus,
PIRGIM


OFFICERS

President  
Lana Pollack

Policy Director
 
James Clift

Associate Director
 
Patrick Diehl

Land Programs Director 

Conan Smith

Special Projects Coodinator

Brad Garmon

Office Manager
 
Judy Bearup

Member Services Director

Michele Scarborough

Policy Specialist

David Gard

Policy Advisor 

Dave Dempsey

Director of Communications and Development
David Holtz

Environmental Campaign Coordinator
 
Wendi Tilden

Project Assistant 

Kristin Brooks

Computer Services Assistant 

Ben Holcomb

Land Programs Assistant 
Ben Stupka

MER Design & Layout 

Rose Homa





The Environmental Deficit
Mounting cuts will have long-term impacts
By James Clift, MEC Policy Director

Michigan is faced with a $1.7 billion dollar deficit next year. The deficit is a result of a downturn in the economy and tax rollbacks that have reduced the amount of tax revenues paid by Michigan businesses and individuals. The deficit will dramatically impact Michigan natural resources as cuts curtail or eliminate programs designed to protect our air, water and public health.

General fund support for the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) has fallen 50% over the last two years. The short-term impacts of these cuts have been delayed by the use of one-time revenue sources. However, they will soon be exhausted. DEQ's ability to protect public health and the environment has already been eroded and will decline further unless new funding is found.

MDEQ Budget General Fund
Fiscal Year 2001-02 $101,007,900
FY 01-02 after cuts $ 83,613,700
Fiscal Year 2002-03 $ 72,432,500
FY 02-03 after cuts $ 66,653,161
FY 2003-04 proposed $ 53,055,800

Governor Granholm tried to protect the MDEQ from further cuts by replacing general fund with user fee proposals. The user fees include doing away with free permits to pollute rivers and lakes, groundwater pollution discharge fees and landfill inspection fees.

The new fees will be used to offset the $13.5 million reduction in general fund support for the department-with the offset general funds helping to balance the state's budget. The remaining funds will be used to restore a small portion of the MDEQ cuts made over the last three years.

MEC believes the reasonable user fee proposals need to be strongly supported. MEC has been working with Clean Water Action, PIRGIM, WMEAC and the League of Conservation Voters Education Fund to promote NPDES permit fees in particular.

Rep. John Pastor (R-Livonia), Chair of the House Appropriation Subcommittee for the DEQ, authored a bill that removed all the new fees and cut general fund support. This resulted in additional general fund cuts of 15% for environmental protection programs and 30% for administration-reducing overall general fund support for the department from $53 million to $44 million.

Impacts of the budget cuts

Cuts to the DEQ Budget approved by the State House would have the following impacts:

  • The layoff of up to 120 employees.
  • Losses of over $15 million in federal grant money, including money for drinking water system and sewer upgrades, non-point source water pollution and radon detection. Under the clean water program, Michigan loses $4 in federal money for each $1 the state fails to place in the fund.
  • Long permit backlogs for businesses-making it harder for Michigan to attract investment.
  • A risk that some state programs, such as the NPDES (water pollution discharge) program, could be taken over by EPA due to the state's failure to operate a credible program.
  • Cuts to the hazardous waste and solid waste program that will reduce the inspection of waste generated within the state or imported from outside our borders.
  • Reduced public access to information on the Internet.
  • Continuation of the policy of free permits for discharges of water pollution into our Great Lakes.

 


 

Copyright 2003 Michigan Environmental Council