|
By
the end of June, the Michigan Department of Environmental
Quality (DEQ) is scheduled to issue a "proposed
decision" on a permit application from Kennecott
Minerals Company to open a sulfide-based nickel mine
north of Marquette in the Upper Peninsula. The sulfide-based
project is controversial because of risks of acid leachate
from sulfide reactions and because the proposal is located
on the Yellow Dog Plains, a resource-rich area that
hosts rare species of trout in the Salmon Trout River.
Procedural timelines established in the state's new
sulfide mining law and rules require the DEQ to make
a preliminary decision on whether to grant or deny the
permit by late June. After issuing this proposed, or
draft, decision, the DEQ will host a second round of
public meetings and take additional comments before
issuing a final decision.
The preliminary decision was originally anticipated
by June 13, but several new issues have arisen that
may further delay the process.
First, a legal appeal by the Yellow Dog Watershed Preserve,
the Keweenaw Bay Indian Community and tribal members
and the nearby Huron Mountain Club challenged the DEQ's
original decision regarding the completeness of Kennecott's
permit application. The groups contend the DEQ should
not have processed the permit application because it
did not contain all the required information. The appeal
resulted in a decision by the Ingham County Circuit
Court Judge that the DEQ should delay the preliminary
decision on a Kennecott Minerals permit application
until the court conducts a hearing on June 22.
Additionally, the discovery in early June of an unknown
number of federally-endangered Kirtland's warblers on
the Yellow Dog Plains near the mine site could mean
additional habitat studies might be required. Kennecott's
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) must fully address
habitat and species impacts, particularly risks to endangered
species.
The EIA contained in the permit application, which relied
on just one year of flora and fauna surveys, indicated
that no warblers were located in the mine's potentially
impacted area.
MEC, the Sierra Club, the National Wildlife Federation
and other groups have consistently said that Kennecott's
permit application should be denied because of serious
deficiencies such as this. The group's concerns include
the completeness and validity of the EIA, definition
of the impacted area of the mine, adequacy of the financial
assurance to remediate accidents, and proof that the
proposed technologies can prevent leaching of pollutants
into ground and surface waters.
The DEQ took public comment on the application at a
series of meetings in April and took written comment
on the draft decision up to May 16. After the preliminary
decision is announced in June, the DEQ will schedule
another round of public comment.
Complicating matters further, the U.P. was recently
named one of the Top 10 summer travel destinations in
the world by Sherman's Travel and was listed on MSN.com's
travel web site. The announcement highlights the disconnection
between leaders who want to promote the region's strong
eco-tourism potential and those who continue looking
to short-term, extractive industries to support the
U.P. economy.
|