|
The
proverbial fat lady hasn't even started her warm-up
scales, much less begun to sing her aria, so it's far
too soon to call winners and losers of this fall's elections.
In spite of polls indicating that across the country
voters are ready to send the Republican-dominated Congress
packing, and that the race for Michigan governor is
a dead heat, smart money says it's way too soon to call
the winners.
Whatever
happens in November, MEC members and supporters will
be listening for signals that candidates-especially
those vying for governor-consider the environment a
priority issue. We will be looking for candidates who
recognize the real threats and opportunities associated
with the biggest environmental issue of all, global
warming. Apparently, this is not a narrowly held viewpoint.
National
pollster John Zogby says candidates would do well to
tap into voters' rising concerns about the impacts of
global warming. Zogby told power brokers gathered at
the Greater Detroit Regional Chamber of Commerce Mackinac
Policy Conference last month, he thinks "the ace
in the hole the Democrats have and they must use, is
global warming." And if it's a good leg-up for
aspiring Democrats, it couldn't hurt Republicans either.
According
to Zogby, there is a national consensus, with 70% of
the voters expressing real concern about global warming.
He points out that this issue cuts across class and
geography, with Fortune 500 CEOs, NASCAR fans, veterans
and people who tilt conservative on gender and social
issues deeply concerned about the quality of their air
and the quality of life in general.
Broad
public concern for a major environmental issue is great
news for those of us who've long hungered for elected
leaders with strong environmental ethics. After years
of suffering through candidates from both parties who
vied to appear the most fiscally conservative, toughest
on crime or narrowly focused on the economy, it's great
to hear a pollster admonish candidates not to ignore
the biggest issue of all-global warming. And Zogby's
advice should be true in spades when voters across the
country see Al Gore's newly-released movie, An Inconvenient
Truth.
MEC
is precluded by its nonprofit tax status from expressing
a preference for specific candidates. However, we are
well within our legal boundaries to demand that every
candidate address the issues to which we are devoting
so much hard work and personal resources. Candidates
who expect our support as individuals-who ask that we
work for them, give them money and cast our votes for
them in November-need to know that we want them to give
our issues plenty of airtime.
The
endless battle over who can create more jobs is important.
But most of us are sophisticated enough to know that
whoever is elected governor will be able to exercise
a much bigger impact on Michigan's environment than
on Michigan's economy. The electorate is also sophisticated
enough to understand that Michigan's economy is inseparably
linked to its natural resources-from the abundant fresh
water necessary for manufacturing to the unspoiled forests
that bring in tourists and contribute to workers' quality
of life.
This
election cycle, perhaps more so than in many years,
candidates who ignore issues related to clean air and
water do so at their own peril.
|