|
Michigan
Environmental Report
Volume 22 . Number 5
October 2004
PURPOSE
Founded in 1980,
MEC is a coalition of over 60 environmental, public health, and faith-based
organizations with nearly 200,000 individual members. For over
20 years, MEC has provided a voice at the State Capitol. In addition
to serving as a clearinghouse of environmental information, MEC develops
public policy, educates elected officials and the public, and provides
training and support to member organizations.
The Michigan
Environmental Report is an official publication of the Michigan Environmental
Council. Copyright 2004.
SUBSCRIBE
OFFICERS
Chairperson
Chris Graham,
Michigan Natural Areas Council
Vice
Chair
Vicki Levengood,
National Environmental Trust
Vice Chair
Terry Miller,
Lone Tree Council
Treasurer
Tom Leonard,
West Michigan Environmental Action Council
Secretary
Brian Imus,
PIRGIM
MEC STAFF
President
Lana Pollack
Policy Director
James Clift
Associate Director
Patrick Diehl
Land Programs Director
Conan Smith
Special Projects Coodinator
Brad Garmon
Office Manager
Judy Bearup
Member Services Director
Michele Scarborough
Policy Specialist
David Gard
Policy Advisor
Dave Dempsey
Environmental
Campaign Coordinator
Wendi Tilden
ECCO Field Director
Stephanie Anderson
Land
Programs Assistant
Ben Stupka
MER Design & Layout
Rose Homa
|
|

|
|
|
November 2: A chance to speak for
the environment
By
Lana Pollack, MEC President
|
People
old enough to remember the Beatles on the Ed Sullivan
Show recall the days when our rivers stank (or burst
into flames), the beaches were littered with rotting
alewives, and our dumps were open pits where kids shot
rats with their .22s. Fortunately, decades ago the country
came together to pass air, water, wildlife, wetlands
and toxics laws that have made America safer, cleaner
and healthier.
The 1960s, 1970s and 1980s were times of monumental
and nationally significant advances in the protection
of Michigan's vast water resources. Spurred on by a
public outraged by gross pollution, Michigan officials
dealt aggressively with the sources of the problem,
toughening laws and stiffening penalties for violations.
When the federal government fell short, Michigan took
the lead, expanding and refining a host of environmental
protections. We became a national leader and were the
first to slash phosphates in our clothes detergents,
ban DDT and pass truth-in-pollution legislation. We
protected wetlands and adopted a state environmental
act that gave citizens the critical right to sue those
who would damage or destroy the state's treasured natural
resources.
Today, looking at a much clearer Lake Michigan, a recovering
Rouge River and cleaner air, it's easy to think we've
put the old environmental threats behind us. But alarmingly,
those of us watching closely are detecting an increase
in firepower directed at long-established environmental
protections. Attacks on environmental and natural resource
protections are coming from both state and federal sources.
State legislators are using their budget-making authority
to take down essential environmental protections, shrinking
state support for environmental protections like a wool
sweater in a hot dryer. They've passed budgets held
together with gimmicks, tapping one-time revenue sources
to pay for ongoing environmental needs. Since 2001,
general fund support for the Department of Environmental
Quality has dropped from $101 million to $28 million.
The $10 million they've added in polluter fees hardly
compensates for lost revenue. Next year, there will
be no new cleanups started on any of the 4,200 leaking
underground storage tanks threatening our water sources.
Without new funding, in future years Michigan's environmental
protections will collapse like dominoes.
Michigan has passed the point where we can use budget
band-aids on our environmental and natural resource
protection problems. People in leadership-our Democratic
governor and the Republican-dominated Legislature-will
have to face up to the reality that without significant
modification of a tax structure designed for a very
different economy, their legacy will be one of environmental
loss and natural resource devastation.
At the federal level the environmental attacks are not
disguised as budget cuts. More common are executive
order rollbacks, rule tampering and Congressional riders
meant to quietly weaken environmental protections.
Evidence abounds that these attacks do not reflect a
public hostile to environmental protections. Rather
it demonstrates that lawmakers are not hearing an environmentally-outraged
public. Our challenge is to alert people to the threat
of serious backsliding and encourage them to vote their
environmental concerns. The next chance for them to
do that will happen on November 2nd.
|
|
|
|
|
|