|
Michigan
Environmental Report
Volume 23 . Number 5
October 2005
PURPOSE
Founded in 1980,
MEC is a coalition of 71 environmental, public health, and faith-based
organizations with nearly 200,000 individual members. For 25 years,
MEC has provided a voice at the State Capitol. In addition to
serving as a clearinghouse of environmental information, MEC develops
public policy, educates elected officials and the public, and provides
training and support to member organizations.
The Michigan
Environmental Report is an official publication of the Michigan Environmental
Council. Copyright 2005.
SUBSCRIBE
OFFICERS
Chairperson
Chris Graham,
Michigan Natural Areas Council
Vice
Chair
Vicki Levengood,
National Environmental Trust
Vice Chair
Terry Miller,
Lone Tree Council
Treasurer
Tom Leonard,
West Michigan Environmental Action Council
Secretary
Jeremy Emmi,
Michigan Nature Association
MEC STAFF
President
Lana Pollack
Policy Director
James Clift
Associate Director
Patrick Diehl
Land Programs Director
Brad Garmon
Land Programs Specialist
Ben Stupka
Development Director
Andy Draheim
Development Specialist
Brianna Gerard
Member Services Director
Michele Scarborough
Policy Specialist
David Gard
Asst. Energy Policy Specialist
Dusty Myers
Campaign Coordinator
Roshani Deraniyagle-Dantas
Deputy Policy Director
Kate Madigan
Development Specialist
Brianna Gerard
Policy
Specialist
Kerry Duggan
Outreach Specialist
Elizabeth Fedorchuk
Health Policy Specialist
Tess Karwoski
MER Design & Layout
Rose Homa
|
|

|
|
|
Preferred alternatives identified for $100 million
SE Michigan transit plan
|
The
earmarking of $100 million in this year's federal transportation
bill has bolstered a proposal for mass transit service
between Ann Arbor and Detroit. The money would fund
the preliminary engineering and environmental impact
statement for the project.
The Southeast Michigan Council of Governments (SEMCOG)
recently held a series of public meetings regarding
the project, which is currently deep into the Alternatives
Analysis phase of the federal New Starts project development
process. During this time, SEMCOG will gather public
input and information to hopefully identify the single
Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA). The LPA is to be
selected through a screening (currently projected for
completion the spring of 2006) and then will advance
to the preliminary engineering and Environmental Impact
Statement portion funded by the recent federal allocation.
The public meetings, held in mid-September in Detroit,
Ann Arbor and Dearborn, allowed SEMCOG and the project
consultant, the Parsons Transportation Group, to solicit
public input on the 13 different alternatives. The options
were recently reduced to five proposals, with two Bus
Rapid Transit (BRT) routes, one Light Rapid Transit
(LRT) route and two Commuter Rail Transit (CRT) routes
being considered.
The proposals under special consideration were chosen
based on five key factors: (1) population within one-half
mile of proposed stations; (2) employment within one-half
mile of proposed stations; (3) travel times; (4) capital
costs; and (5) operating and maintenance costs.
"These evaluation categories were chosen out of
a set of 20 that were established at public meetings
in 2004," said SEMCOG Transportation Coordinator
Alex Bourgeau. "They provided us with the biggest
differential in examining obvious flaws in the proposals."
The two bus rapid transit options (BRT 5) under consideration
would use dedicated transit lanes to operate along Michigan
Avenue from Ypsilanti to downtown Detroit, and along
Washtenaw Avenue, Jackson Avenue and Huron Street to
serve Ann Arbor. It would offer mass transit service
using rubber-tired vehicles and provide flexibility
because vehicles can operate in dedicated lanes or in
general traffic.
The light rail option (LRT 5) would operate on a double-tracked
rail line in the median of Huron Street, Washtenaw Avenue
and Jackson Avenue from Ypsilanti to Ann Arbor, and
on the same type of line along Michigan Avenue from
Ypsilanti to downtown Detroit. The system would be an
electrically-powered, high-capacity transit service
operating on a fixed-guide system.
The first commuter rail (CRT 1) would operate along
the existing Norfolk-Southern Michigan line with shuttle
service provided to Metro Airport. The second CRT option
(CRT 2) would operate on a dedicated double-tracked
railroad along Merriman Road to the existing Norfolk-Southern
Michigan line to Detroit, while rapid bus service would
connect Metro Detroit to Ann Arbor. The commuter rail
option is a regional passenger rail service that typically
shares railroad mainline tracks with freight operations.
In this case, it could provide a cost-effective alternative
through the use of the existing Norfolk-Southern Michigan
line.
At the end of the Alternative Analysis phase, currently
projected for spring of 2006, SEMCOG will select a Locally
Preferred Alternative (LPA) for consideration in the
Preliminary Engineering and Final Environmental Impact
Statement phases.
###
SEMCOG
and its consultants, the Parsons Transportation Group,
are interested in your comments. They want to ensure
the project reflects public input and has public support.
The office deadline for public comments was October
7, 2005, but the project group is open to receive comments
at any time.
If you want to know more details about the specific
routes, vehicle types, project background and timeline,
visit: http://www.annarbordetroitrapidtransitstudy.com.
Comments can be registered at the web site or sent by
mail to:
Carmine
Palombo, Director of Transportation Programs
Southeast Michigan Council of Governments
535 Griswold Street, Suite 300
Detroit, MI 48226-3602
palombo@semcog.org
or (313) 961-4266
|
|
|
|